Mike Tomlin backs handkerchiefs over NFL provocations

Mike Tomlin backs handkerchiefs over NFL provocations

The Pittsburgh head coach’s remarks come a day after the Steelers benefited from an inappropriate handkerchief against the Bears on “MNF.”

PITTSBURGH – Increased emphasis on the NFL With respect to punishment for provocation has been a source of strong criticism throughout the first half of the season, but the head coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers, Mike Tomlin, supports the rule and its application.

“We are just trying to clean up the game,” he said. Tomlin, a member of the NFL Competition Committee, this Tuesday. “We accept the responsibility that comes with being the role models that we are.

“This game is being played at the highest level, and we understand that there are people who play it at a lower level and observe us and often copy the things we do and how we conduct ourselves, and in general like the Competition Committee of the league. specifically, there was a desire to improve in that area. That has been expressed to our boys. “

The Steelers have not been punished for provocation this season, but they benefited from a critical handkerchief during a 29-27 win against the Chicago Bears Monday night

The linebacker Cassius Marsh, a former player of the Steelers, captured Ben roethlisberger on the third time during the final stretch of the fourth period. But, after celebrating with a roundhouse kick, staring at the bench Steelers while walking in his direction and contacting the officer Tony Corrente, Marsh was penalized for provocation, a 15-yard penalty that gave Pittsburgh a first attempt that eventually led to the winning field goal of Chris Boswell, from 52 yards.

“I think it was just an inopportune moment. It is quite clear to everyone who saw it, that I was not provoking,” he argued. Marsh. “I’ve been doing that celebration my entire career. It’s just sad to see things like this happen in a close game like that.”

In a media report, Current justified the handkerchief, pointing out that his contact with Marsh it was not a factor in the call.

“First of all, keep in mind that provocation is a point of emphasis this year,” he said. Current, according to the report. “And having said that, I saw the player, after making a big play, run towards the bench area of ​​the Pittsburgh Steelers and prostrate in such a way that I felt like I was provoking them.

“I did not judge [el contacto] Like something I dealt with That had nothing to do with it. It was the provocation aspect. “

Tomlin admitted that the call against Marsh it was a learning opportunity for his players.

“We have shown examples of this throughout the team development process,” he revealed on Tuesday. “And we will continue to reinforce examples of it in a negative way along the way, for ourselves and for others.”

The head coach of the Steelers has been a vocal proponent of the controversial provocation penalty this season, speaking in the first instance on the issue prior to the August 21 preseason match against the Detroit Lions.

“Nothing out of the ordinary,” he said Tomlin regarding how he enforces the application of the rule with his players. “It’s not something we subscribe to or stick with. Nothing out of the ordinary. We appreciate the league’s willingness to end some of it.”

And in September, Tomlin he also expressed support for the rule. “I have been focused on the stadiums we are in, but all of us accept that it is something that must be taken care of,” he reported in September. “That is why it is a point of emphasis and why it is not surprising to anyone that the number has increased. Players will adjust. They always do. It is convenient for them to adjust quickly, and specifically, I am talking about my own.”

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
confused confused
fail fail
fun fun
geeky geeky
love love
lol lol
omg omg
win win